
Don't
get me wrong, I am a HUGE fan of ILS’s, but as a Marketing Director for
a portfolio of affordable communities, I feel the ILS's are
"missing the boat" for the affordable audience
The affordable community office is typically busier than a conventional office,
and this is primarily due to the additional paperwork necessary to stay in
compliance with their state. I train my leasing teams to know the value
of great customer service with prospective and current residents rather it is
in person or on the phone and doing some "extras" in an effort to
keep the residents happy and thus reduce turnover. SO when they get
numerous calls, internet leads, and visits from prospective traffic who
have seen our listing on one of the ILS sites and they do not meet the income
guidelines, they begin to get discouraged and the quality of service declines.

Some
of our affordable communities have dropped out of the internet listing
sites just because of the number of unqualified leads. They do produce a
lot of leads! But, in reality, most of those leads are unqualified.
The
LIHTC database, created by HUD and available to the public since 1997, contains
information on 39,094 projects and almost 2,458,000 housing units placed in
service between 1987 and 2012*.
THAT’S
OVER 2 MILLION UNITS! Will that make the ILS’s revisit their page formats and create a
format for the affordable and senior communities. Who will be first??!!
*